Yes it's been a long time. Working for the man can do that to you. But it's all good because sometimes working for the man ain't such a bad thing. Good pay, good people, great benefits. I can't bitch when 45 million Americans don't have what I have...
health insurance.
So let's start at the beginning....answering questions from the last post about the war in Iraq. The war isn't much in the news these days because according to our extremely curious and deep-digging press (See post "The Fourth Estate") the surge is working. In reality, I think it's probably a combination of the Presidential election and celebrity obsessions.
No one responded to MLW saying that knew anyone in Iraq personally - a few extended relationships. I still don't know anyone personally - there was a guy who I was friends with in grade school but he is long since back. Imagine being sent to war at 46.
What have we accomplished in almost 5 years?
I know a brutal dictator was taken down. A dictator we supported in the recent past. I don't know of any other accomplishment to put under this category. With all the mainstream media support of Bush's war, it's surprising that I can't name more victories ripped straight from today's headline!
How many American servicemen and women have been killed?
Since the war began on March 19, 2003, the Department of Defense (DOD) lists 3,921 American soldiers killed as of January 12, 2008.
How many American servicemen and women have been injured?
28, 822. Twenty percent of these are serious brain or spinal injuries. More than 30% of soldiers returning home will suffer from serious mental health problems.
How many Iraqi civilians have been killed since the war began?
The DOD doesn't keep records of civilians killed in war. You would think we'd be interested in knowing how many people have been killed in a country we are trying to "save." But nope. Not interested.
A British polling agency, Opinion Research Business who has been working in Iraq since 2005, released results in September 2007, that report more than 1 million Iraqis have been killed since the invasion began.
More than 1, 000, 000.
Most reports say that under Saddam, 100,000 Iraqis were killed. Do the math and tell me we haven't created a new generation who will hate us.
How many Iraqi civilians are now refugees?
There are more than 2 million Iraqi refugees currently living in Syria and Jordan. That's about half the population of Iraq before America waged war.
How much have Halliburton's profits increased since the war?
Halliburton's CEO, David Lesar's stock has increased by $78 million since the war began in 2003. The company itself has profited $13 billion. Although it's subsidiary, Kellog, Brown & Root was sold in 2007 (after they were handed down indictments when a Pentagon audit revealed rampant overcharging), they still have contracts worth up to $18 billion including the single no-bid contract "Restore Iraq Oil." I haven't even mentioned their contracts in Afghanistan.
How much have oil companies profited since the war?
Exxon posted record profits in 2006 - 39.5 billion. The biggest in their history. According to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, "In 2006, the big five oil companies made $97 billion — nearly five times their profits in 2002."
She described this rise as obscene. I think it's safe to say the only oil company who wouldn't have profited during this time is the now-defunct Arbusto Oil Company because their CEO wasn't very smart. Although he was smart enough to go bust and still walk out with cash. I'm not sure if that's smart or corrupt.
Now the Election
I think this race is going to topple a lot of longstanding conventional wisdom when it comes to American presidential elections. I can't tolerate TV coverage because all the reporters are so ridiculous - more interested in their celebrity status than actual journalism. Can we please get Bill Moyers to moderate a debate.
I watched both debates the first week in January and it continues to amaze me how the media and other candidates laugh at Ron Paul's wise comments about our foreign policy. Rudy Giuliani, in particular, makes such incredibly ignorant statements that I can't believe anyone takes him seriously. He is especially ridiculous when he talks about knowing how to handle terrorism. As a reminder, Rudy -against all expert advice- placed his emergency operations next door to the heretofore only American location attacked by terrorists -hardly indicative of good judgment.
The truth is - anyone is going to be better than George Bush. But we actually have a choice this time, so might as well be particular.
Who I Support and What I Think About The Others
I'm still for John Edwards. I've seen him speak twice since the last posting and each time he's impressed me with his vision for the future. He's not in the press much except as being behind in the polls and being portrayed as "too angry." He's still has a more passionate and authentic narrative than any of the other candidates. An AP article this morning indicated he still has 20% of American voters behind him and they are considered very loyal.
I think while John's message has hope it reminds us of what's under the carpet. Americans in this day and age are extremely judgmental about poverty or they feel all sorts of power about monitoring how their tax-deductible charity is spent. On the one hand, I agree. Life is about choices. Fiscal responsibility is a powerful choice.
But I can tell you, that it's by the grace of God that some of my bad choices and fiscal irresponsibilityhaven't landed me in a low-paying job, living in a crappy, unsafe apartment, with too many kids, and an abusive husband. At each step of the way in my life, there were people or institutions who extended themselves to help me. From work studies in high school to student loans for college to friends who got me an interview at the right place, I had help. That's what makes my experience as an American great. The ability to move up with encouragement and help. I didn't get here on my own.
My bottom line with Edwards - he's the real deal.
Hillary Clinton - I think she's the best debater, very competent, and brilliant. I think her tears were real. Trust me, I have cried more than once in the bathroom at work. And while I've had some shitty bosses (both men and women), I didn't have to put up with the indignity of journalists and pundits making fun of my hair, my ass, my cleavage, and my clothes. And yes that's what you get when you are in the public eye but why do we tolerate that?
And contrary to Maureen Dowd's misogynistic (yes, she's a woman-hater) comments, I think it was more than just about losing. I am conflicted about not supporting a woman because it's about damn time we had a woman as President. All this talk of being power-hungry. Why is wanting to have power to make changes a bad thing? Men have thirsted for power since time began but someone how it's evil when it's a woman.
My bottom line with Hillary - she keeps supporting the war and she's has so much lobbyist money behind her. How is she going to get universal health care that doesn't ensure the insurance and pharma companies keep reaping the monstrous profits?
Barack Obama - He's the male version of Hillary as for as special interests. He's got Wall Street and is only second to Hillary in health care lobbyists behind him. I was impressed that Samantha Power is his foreign policy advisor. Sure he was against the war in 2002, but once he got power, he voted to keep the funding. And yes the troops need funding to maintain but where's the fight to bring them home? Where's the fight to make sure they are adequately cared for when they return?
Smooth, elegant, intellectual, and aloof. I met the guy when I was at the height of my support for him and even then I could say he was not warm. Friendly but not warm. I think he's a poet and I think he's an unparalleled orator. I've got his DNC speech on my iPod! But I think he's the Ronald Reagan of the Democratic party. Great looks, great brain, great words, great speaker - but what else is there? I like his wife better.
My bottom line with Barack - I thought he was Bobby Kennedy and he's Jack instead.
Gail Collins wrote in The New York Times last week, "Who is 21 and not for Obama?"
Gloria Steinem endorsed Hillary.
Michael Moore is behind Edwards.
I think it's up for grabs. Still.
Questions for You
Who are you for?
Which network do you watch for coverage?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Great post! I can't stand much more of the media coverage. Everyone seems to be taking an "Access Hollywood" approach. Hillary's tears the headline? Give me a break. The only election coverage I watch these days is on Comedy Central. I'm still a huge supporter of Edwards. I was in Illinois recently and was happily surprised to hear my dad mention he was a supporter of Edwards as well. The general consensus among my family members was that Obama got elected to office and has done nothing but campaign for president since. He is not well-loved by some in his home state! I was also heartened to hear that my neighborhood association in SF is backing Edwards. They don't have that much influence, but it is a glimmer of hope, nonetheless!
I don't think we have any big policy differences among the Dems so it comes down to leadership style and who has the best chance not only of converting visions into reality but of carrying enough Democratic votes to bring along a good majority in the House and Senate so we don't have continual stalemate. I have heard from one democratic congressional member in a closely won district that she fears having Hillary as the nominee will turn her independent voters back to a Republican vote. As much as I hate considering these collateral matters, I think that's hard to ignore and so for the time being will support Obama.
Post a Comment